Search our site
divorce360.com provides help, advice and community for people
contemplating, going through or recovering from divorce and the issues around it,
including separation, divorce laws, spousal support and emotional issues.

profile
Community  :: lawyerkelly's Stuff  :: lawyerkelly's Blog

   
Personal Tags
ADVERTISING PARTNERS


Blogs
You can search for Blogs by tag here:


Invite Others
Invite friends and family to join you on d360! - Click here

Christie Brinkley's Divorce Tactics 

Recently, I appeared on TV Guide again to discuss Christie Brinkley's divorce tactics. Apparently, she is determined to air Peter Cook's dirty laundry. That begs the question - Why?

 

In a divorce case, does infidelity play a role? The answer turns on fault v. no-fault divorce, which this article shall discuss.

 

First thing to know: California is a no-fault state. ("But why are there so many earthquakes?!", interjects my witty and incredibly handsome husband).

 

Seriously now: No-fault, in legal terms, means that a dissolution of a marriage (divorce) does not require a showing wrong-doing of either party nor any evidentiary proceedings at all. In the olden days, Judges would only grant a divorce upon a showing that one of the parties committed some type of wrongdoing: adultery, abuse, abandonment, etc. If the Judge decided that the alleged wrongdoer didn't commit the wrongful acts, the divorce would be rejected.

 

Because of these strict requirements, married couples who had absolutely committed no wrongs, but were just sick of being married to each other, would begin to lie about who committed faults in order to obtain a divorce. In 1950, the most popular allegation for grounds of divorce was "cruelty", apparently cited by 70% of divorce cases. So, things begin to change. In the 1960's, proponents argued that the law should adapt by providing a straightforward procedure for ending a marriage, rather than forcing a couple who couldn't get along to choose between living together in "marital hell" or lying under oath in open court.

 

So our wonderfully innovative of State of California, in 1970, pioneered the first "no-fault" divorce, signed in by Ronald Reagan.

 

I conducted cursory research on this topic, and discovered that now, in 49 states, there is an option of no-fault divorce. New York is the only state that remains strictly fault.

 

That may help explain Christie Brinkley's determination to air the lurid details of her husband's affair. Arguably not, because everyone already knows about that, and the grounds for a divorce have already been established.

by lawyerkelly  14 Posts 

Posted on 7/11/2008 10:06 AM
Get AlertsGet Alerts!
Sent to Friendsend to friend
0

Tags: TV Guide , No-Fault , Christie Brinkley , Divorce ,
Marriage , Court
<< Previous Post  |  Blog posts by lawyerkelly  | 


Comments for "Christie Brinkley's Divorce Tactics"  (0) (You must be logged in to answer)






Divorce360.com is not a substitute for advice from a lawyer, accountant, financial planner, therapist or other professional to obtain advice. Divorce360.com is not intended to, and should not, take the place of professional advice. The opinions expressed in the divorce360.com message boards are those of the author and the author alone. Divorce360.com does not endorse any specific product or service.

expand information center
divorce focused content ::
divorce most popular ::
1. Is your Marriage Sexless?
Want More Sex in your Marriage? 5 Tips to Help if your Marriage Has Turned Sexless

2. Single Parenting: 10 Tips to a Good Relationship
Relationships: How to Tell if Someone Is Good for Me, if Relationship is Healthy?

3. When Is a Marriage Worth Saving?
10 Things to Think About When Considering Whether to Stick with a Relationship

4. Two First Borns? Bad Match
Birth Order Can Indicate Whether your Marriage Will Work Out -- or Not

5. Divorcing? 15 Costly Financial Mistakes
Settlements: 15 Critical Financial Mistakes Often Made in the Heat of Divorce