sign in | join
Actually, when scorned ex's take to the net to air their anger in places such as YouTube, MySpace, Facebook etc - and it is brought to light in the court - it is not looked at favorably AT ALL. There is an undercurrent from that point forward with the judge and both counsel as to mental stability.
Using the "lack of sex" (aka constructive abandonment) as grounds for divorce is an iffy prospect. What their sex life prior to marriage was as opposed to what it was after marriage comes into play to establish what is considered "normal relations" between them - but to use constructive abandonment they actually have to be living together and not being sexually active, and I got the impression even while "happily" married they didn't spend a whole hell of a lot of time in the same place together...I don't think this is going to end well for her and her YouTube antics won't help. I'm a family law attorney
Divorce360.com is not a substitute for advice from a lawyer, accountant, financial planner, therapist or other professional to obtain advice. Divorce360.com is not intended to, and should not, take the place of professional advice. The opinions expressed in the divorce360.com message boards are those of the author and the author alone. Divorce360.com does not endorse any specific product or service.
