Normal
0
false
false
false
EN-US
X-NONE
X-NONE
MicrosoftInternetExplorer4
st1\:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) }
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-qformat:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
The Florida
legislature recently enacted laws that abolished the concept of “primary” and
“secondary” child custody as well as “visitation.” The court system was overwhelmed with parents
who were fighting not only about at whose home the child would spend most of
his time, but also over who should have the title of primary child custodian. Many believed that, if they were deemed the
“secondary” child custodian, then they were also a second-class parent. Further, many parties resented that they had
to “visit” the child rather than live with or spend time with the child. In an effort to help parents avoid fighting
over semantics, the Florida
legislature adopted the concept of “time-sharing” to replace the old regime of
awarding custody to one parent or the other.
The
Florida Legislature also modified and expanded the factors that courts must
consider when making a determination on the issue of time-sharing. The overriding concern remains the best interests
of the child. There are now twenty
factors for consideration, some of which are highlighted below:
·
The ability of each parent to have a close
relationship with the child;
·
The ability of each parent to work with the
other parent;
·
The ability of each parent to put the needs of
the child before his or her own needs;
·
How parental responsibilities will likely be
divided when the divorce is finalized;
·
Whether each parent will require some sort of
child care during his or her time-sharing schedule;
·
How long the child has lived in a stable home;
·
Whether the parents live near each other and the
child’s school;
·
How well the child is doing in school;
·
How well informed each parent is of the child’s
scholastic and extracurricular activities;
·
Whether each parent is involved in the child’s
school or extracurricular activities;
·
The ability of each parent to provide a routine
for the child;
·
Whether each parent is morally fit;
·
The physical and mental health of each parent;
·
The preference of the child;
·
Whether there has been any domestic violence or
other abuse or neglect;
·
Whether either parent has falsely accused the
other parent of abuse;
·
The responsibilities of each parent toward the
child before the petition for divorce was filed;
·
Whether either parent has exposed the child to
alcohol or drug abuse;
·
Whether each parent has shielded the child from
the divorce litigation;
·
The ability of each parent to meet the child’s
current and future developmental needs; and
·
Anything else that the court believes is
relevant.
To review the full text of the new legislation, see
section 61.13(3) of the Florida Statutes.
Courts
may give each factor different weight based on the circumstances of a
particular case. If you have questions
concerning how the factors might apply to your case, be sure to consult an
attorney experienced in family law.
Richard J. Mockler
and Adam B. Cordover are family law attorneys at Richard
J. Mockler, P.A., located in Tampa, Florida. For a free consultation or more information
on time-sharing or other family law matters, please visit our website at http://www.FamilyLawRights.com .